Protest of fast-track fees sign now

We write to ask that you discontinue the policy of fast-tracking submissions for a fee.

We have two objections to the policy. First is that we are against any form of preferential treatment for those who can pay. Fast-tracking for a fee creates a two-tier system, wherein the well-funded have an unfair advantage over the less well-to-do; in particular, it exacerbates the differences between developed and developing nations. The fast-track policy at the least allows faster publication by those with funds, improving the chance for the funded to win subsequent grants and to publish before other labs working on the same topic.

Our second objection to the policy stems from our concern that fast-tracked manuscripts will receive an advantage above and beyond just faster publication. Your policy requires that reviewers review more rapidly and editors make their decision in a shorter time than for non-fast-tracked manuscripts. There are three possible negative effects of this. First is that the reduced time for reviewers to spend on their work may lead to more superficial and less stringent reviews. Second is that the editor may sometimes have to complete their action letter on the basis of fewer reviews, when the reviewers do not finish by the deadline. The consequence is that at least some fast-tracked articles will receive less critical reviewing than those by author teams who do not pay for fast-track. The third possible negative effect reflects the linkage between fast-tracked articles and the journals finances. Your journal would receive more money if it evaluates fast-tracked articles less stringently, and even if it does not succumb to this incentive the readers may always have that perception.

Overall, the association of author fees with preferential treatment may eventually imperil sciences reputation among governments and the public. Science traditionally has been something of a refuge from the injustice of rich vs. poor, and previously in publishing there has always been the expectation that publication of an article is a mark of the quality of the work, not the depth of the pockets behind it.

Superficially, the policy of fees for fast-tracking seems similar to the Gold Open Access model, in which authors pay a fee to have their article published if it passes peer review. In most of those journals, however, the policy is set so that authors who pay are treated the same as those who dont. Most Gold OA journals offer a waiver for authors who cannot afford the usual fee, and reviewers and editors do not know whose fees are waived and whose are not. And in those unfortunate cases of journals that require a fee for all, at least there is no difference within the journal with some articles receiving preferential treatment.

We, the undersigned, will not submit work to a journal which offers competitive advantages at a financial premium; nor will we review for any such journal.

Alex O. Holcombe, PhD, Senior Lecturer, School of Psychology, University of Sydney ([email protected])
Claudia Koltzenburg, Managing editor, Cellular Therapy and Transplantation (an open access journal in Western/Russian cooperation), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany ([email protected])
Kaan Цztьrk, Dept. of Information Systems and Technologies, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey. ([email protected])
Ayşe Karasu, METU, Dept. of Physics, Ankara, Turkey ([email protected])
Arman Abrahamyan, PhD, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, School of Psychology, University of Sydney ([email protected])
Bill Hooker, Portland, OR ([email protected])
William Gunn, San Diego CA
Daniel Mietchen, PhD, Jena, Germany ([email protected])
Daniel Linares, PhD, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain ([email protected])
Barton L. Anderson, School of Psychology, University of Sydney
Kiley Seymour, PhD, Alexander von Humboldt postdoctoral fellow, Berlin, Germany
Bjцrn Brembs, PhD, Heisenberg Fellow, Freie Universitдt Berlin, Germany
M Fabiana Kubke, PhD, University of Auckland, New Zealand
Graham Steel, Glasgow, Scotland ( graham at )
Matthew Davidson, Psychology Dept, Columbia University ([email protected])
Richard Badge, PhD, Lecturer, Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, UK ([email protected])
Pedro Mendes, PhD, Professor, School of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, UK ([email protected])
R. Steven Kurti, PhD, Director Biomaterials and Photonics Laboratory, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry, California ([email protected])

The above are the original authors and signatories. The link will reveal new (post 25 April 2011) signatories.

Sign The Petition


If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and the password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.

Privacy in the search engines? You can use a nickname:

Attention, the email address you supply must be valid in order to validate the signature, otherwise it will be deleted.

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing


Who signed this petition saw these petitions too:

Sign The Petition


If you already have an account please sign in


I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing

0 / 50

Latest Signatures

No one has signed this petition yet

Tonya BrewerBy:
Petition target:
Obesity Reviews, International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, Journal of Convergence Information Technology, International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, Advances in Information Science and Service Sciences (


No tags


Invite friends from your address book

Embed Codes

direct link

link for html

link for forum without title

link for forum with title